[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5046517/8.2-seconds-needed-to-fall-in-love.html[/url]
Discuss.
I will also never stare at a woman for more than 5 seconds ever again. Unless she is naked, that is an exception.
Printable View
[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5046517/8.2-seconds-needed-to-fall-in-love.html[/url]
Discuss.
I will also never stare at a woman for more than 5 seconds ever again. Unless she is naked, that is an exception.
I spend whole hours a day looking at boobs (different ones over the course of the day). Does that count?
And yet again a deceptive article to get more people to read it.
Since when does looking at someone you find to be beautiful equal to being in love?Quote:
The men looked into the eyes of actresses they considered beautiful for an average of 8.2 seconds, but that dropped to 4.5 seconds when gazing at those they rated less attractive, the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior reported.
And secondly they're having conversations 1-on-1 in a prepared environment, why would you not look into their eyes? They make it sound as if its a restaurant, your eyes meet, and no one looks away because you're both stunned.
Bullshit.
What a load of bs. They were really reaching on this one. If a guy falls in love after 8.2 seconds of 'gazing' on first introductions.. then how come so many males choose women who aren't as beautiful as instinct would demand they seek out? Perhaps there's more to love than seeing that she's hot and fertile?
Oh wait... that can't be possible... cause men are suppose to be insensitive pricks.. right? I wonder if a femi-nazi wrote this... I'm almost willing to bet money...
Lol ok seems you guys are taking this far too seriously.
It's a survey of course it's inaccurate, surveys are the fox news of statistics.
Well, we sure as hell try our best. But some days i wake up and just wonder, what's the point? But we keep trucking on. Someone's gotta show the younger folks how we roll...Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeradalia [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
The study was bad and worded poorly. However, I have heard from a few men that he knows if he wants a woman long term, short term, etc the minute he talks to her for the first time. What really actually happens depends on what happens next and if the woman proves him otherwise.
All these technical studies based on fractions of a second. I'm pretty sure an erection is a pretty solid sign of love if you're looking for a shallow, tell all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cbrider [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Erection = sign of lust, really troubling thought, neurological problem, 'it' needs air, the guy just woke up, pants felt too good... etc.
Sorry, but an erection is not nearly so cut and dry of an indicator as you would think.
True say,Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeradalia [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
if it were so I would love aloooooooooot of fellow busers.
I fall in love with girls every day.
I saw this fit, tan, straight black haired girl in short shorts today.
God, I wanted to rub my dick in her vagina so bad.
Aeradalia ... do me a huge favor and never use the words "erection" and "cut" in the same sentence!!! :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Aeradalia [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Carl.
Quote:
Originally Posted by carl1222 [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Hehe... no problem..
Because they ain't so hot themselves and something's better than nothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeradalia [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
is that a continuous 8.2 second or added all together for the first meeting?