Yes of course... I'm just referring to the fact that in the "media" of those times, women weren't sexually objectified more than men were (certainly not in the examples Smackie posted). Both men and women were sexual "objects".
Also, all the natural differences were taken into account, as opposed to "mainstream porn" nowadays in which all women are thin with big boobs and tiny pink vulvas, they get off via penetration alone and with improbable screaming and contorted facial expressions, etc... which is what young men nowadays grow up believing is the "norm".
There is more realistic porn as well, but it's harder to find.
I don't get why you keep trying to make this a "man vs woman" discussion. I have said numerous times that I have nothing against porn in general - it's just "teen porn" that I don't quite understand and that disturbs me if grown men watch it. Not that this is the point of the thread anyway, as I've also repeated numerous times.