I wouldn't bother watching it, Exeter. Better movies to spend time on.
Printable View
I wouldn't bother watching it, Exeter. Better movies to spend time on.
Gf watched 50 shades darker with her friends she couldn't pay me enough to see it and she thought it was horrible, and she was surprised? rofl
I haven't seen 50 Shades of Gray or read the book. I have absolutely zero interest either. From what I have heard people say about it, it is basically akin to abusive porn. I still do not understand how it became so popular. I mean, again, I can't really judge from experience having never bothered with it at all, but from what I've heard of it from others it sounds like something we should be ashamed is part of our human existence.... not something we should accept on such a main stream level. But, maybe if others have seen the movies or read the book you can clarify if maybe what I've heard of it is a bit overblown.
same here, i have no interest in either of those 50 shades movies. i think because they were books first is why it has such a following, fantasy of the reader putting themselves into the story is what made the movies take off.
I saw the first one :] hehehe wasn't sexy at all, the guy was nice looking but all it was about was peoples dysfunctional relationships & past issues they carry into adulthood.
The chemistry between the two actors is about as sexual and romantic as two dead fishes. There imo is none.
[MENTION=81349]topazlight[/MENTION] lmao on two dead fishes. i think movies like 50 shades is all about pulling gimmicks about sexuality to lure lonely women and men into its spiderweb. even the books, same as.
[MENTION=70896]Exeter19[/MENTION] ~ Agree too. It is like it wants to trick us into thinking it is somehow romantic.
Alice through the looking glass latest with Depp wasn't good ~ Depp's personal life I think is ruining his acting abilities. Can't think of many movies he has done last few years that were any good.
That's why I am so perplexed as to why 50 Shades of Gray became so popular and so mainstream. Again.... it isn't like I've read the book or seen the movie, so I can't say for sure....
But from what I have heard it basically glorifies physical abuse like that is supposed to somehow be sexy/okay. If that is true, I don't get how in the blue Hell something like that isn't shunned/a very niche thing that only people who are into that sort of thing care about. Somehow it became mainstream and popular.
I can't recall the whole story off the first, I did see it haha it wasn't good...but the lead male was a submissive when young to an older woman and then when older wants a younger female who will be a submissive to him. Thing is you don't care about him or her so that is a big reason why those movies are a fail to most.
Wasn't the worse but it wasn't that well done or even that well received I think at Cannes it was booed? Something not great happened there with this movie but made me want to see it and I didn't enjoy it and it had really good actors in it too. The Sea of Trees.
I tried to watch a few of Joan Crawford old movies because of that TV show they made recently and I really didn't enjoy them at all. Not a big fan of face acting, if that is what you call it. Don't really like her as an actress either.
Snatched was pretty bad. I fell into but that last one was good so this should be too. Like Borat was funny and then Bruno ( horrible) not that funny.
agree, bruno was an awful movie. he tried to hard with that one.
Yeah, I didn't enjoy Bruno all that much either. I would agree with Exeter's assessment. He tried too hard. Yes, in Borat he was intentionally trying to annoy people, but it came across more naturally and resulted in some legitimately funny moments. I would agree in Bruno it was like he was trying too hard to deliberately be offensive/in your face/etc. and it just wasn't as good.