Thanks for nothing, DMass.
Printable View
Thanks for nothing, DMass.
Fine I'll respondQuote:
Originally Posted by bohemiandonut [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
I wouldn't call it contextual at all. That's definitely sugar coating it. It can be measured with some degree of accuracy, such as an average range. I can post a lot of very concrete statistics but won't..Quote:
Originally Posted by IndiReloaded [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
The idea isn't to take a COMPLETELY quantitative approach to this, but somewhat qualitativeQuote:
Originally Posted by IndiReloaded [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
The argument in this case is not that it is cultural but more of thing of population genetics. It's not as bad as the KKK which was just a bunch of hate mongers. It's just people look at statistics objectively, the results probably made them feel extremely shittyQuote:
Originally Posted by lilwing [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Wow donut, you've been at Berkeley how long and those assclown libs haven't convinced you of utopia yet. Congrats!Quote:
Originally Posted by bohemiandonut [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]