What does that have to do with the topic of this thread though?
Printable View
What does that have to do with the topic of this thread though?
Because Smackie mentioned "consequences" before. And some other people mentioned "responsibility." All I am saying is that this man cannot be forced to do anything. Simple.Quote:
Originally Posted by searock [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Even with ethics, as I said before, this man is not morally wrong or right since this woman can get an abortion. If she keeps the baby and just complains that the man walked out when he said he would then he is not immoral.
EDIT:
No it was just Smackie who mentioned it. But she brought it in. The guy was a dumbass but he has no responsibility.
The condom broke, dude. He didn't hold her down and shoot for the moon.Quote:
Originally Posted by AGuy101 [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Makes very little sense. It makes even less sense when you compare your statement to the subject of this thread.Quote:
Then I said that a woman, a man and a child have equal rights. A woman cannot take a man's rights and a baby cannot take a woman's rights. Because then there would be no rights. I compared it to the military draft because taking people against their will to fight and die is an abdication (step down, let go, etc.) of rights. Whose rights are they protecting?
Do you have an opinion and followed by some advice that actually relates to the topic at hand?Quote:
Go ahead and ignore that. If so, then we aren't talking about sense: we are talking about your claim to my life.
Recap: They had sex, the condom broke, she took the morning after pill. He's still worried that she could be pregnant. She should take a pregnance test. He's mad because people aren't responding to the facts.
Yes. I know the condom broke. I said, before, that there is no reason to cum at all. I said that someone who is doing it for an hour+ (quote me) will not let it go. Why let it go?
You explain to me what sense is instead of saying what it isn't.
It's been like 2 days. I don't know anything about it but 2 days seem like an over reaction.
There are 5 senses. You use them to figure out that fire will burn you and food will sustain you. That is reason. The subject of the thread is: "is she pregnant?" Doubt it. I don't care. But Smackie decided to say he has a moral oath to her. So I defended him.
Excuse me? Why let it go?
Why not let it go? Isn't the point of having sex to have an orgasm?
The rest I'll not comment on because frankly they sound like the ramblings of a person who hasn't taken their Stelazine.
Lol...... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Wakeup [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
You just did comment. And you don't have to let it go within someone. I love how you used "Stelazine." Nice verbose touch. Once again, "argument from intimidation." Please read my argument. Or just be on your merry way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wakeup [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
And you are right about letting it go. But no need to do it in someone. This person, if he had control, didn't have to do that while he was inside her.
You might as well continue with the superficial insults. I am done.
I think they didn't realize the condom broke until they finished sex - or it broke as he was orgasming.
Finally you're being clear and precise. Why you can't just say "he could have pulled out" instead of saying "No reason to cum at all." If you were clear, then there would be no reason to ask questions about what you're trying to convey. Perhaps it's a language barrier?Quote:
you don't have to let it go within someone
You step up on a soap box before you have even been challenged. *shrugs*
Maybe he didn't realize the condom broke until after? Or it broke during his orgasm?Quote:
Originally Posted by AGuy101 [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
You sound kindy trippy, Guy. Is english your first language? Trying to give you the benefit of doubt here.
Yes, this. Just saw Searocks sensible post.Quote:
Originally Posted by searock [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Not any contraceptive pill give 100% assurance but you can also check is she pregnent or not by using simple pregnency test....
I'm pretty sure the law would not agree with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by AGuy101 [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
u r stupid, whatever happen take responsibility