Originally Posted by
IndiReloaded
[Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
I find it laughable that so many of you are attacking Vash for actually *getting it right* and providing not only a stable home, but a stable TWO parent home. She even did it for her non-biologic children, which is a marvel when you consider it. Only a stupid person would antagonize her. Personally, if I were a single parent, I'd be wanting to know how she managed it.
I think there are a lot of couples who could have sucked it up for their kids sake who selfishly choose not to. I dunno that's anyone here, but its certainly true for a lot of young couples who were perhaps not truly ready to have a child.
The data is clear: unless there is clear abuse or otherwise damaging influences (e.g. drugs or criminal behaviour), then a child is usually more healthy (and wealthy!) if they grow up in a two-parent household. If you are a single parent then you have to make the best of the situation, but that's not the same as it being the best situation.
In examining the negative impacts on children more closely, the study discovered that it was only the children in very high-conflict homes who benefited from the conflict removal that divorce may bring. In lower-conflict marriages that end in divorce — and the study found that perhaps as many as two thirds of the divorces were of this type — the situation of the children was made much worse following a divorce. Based on the findings of this study, therefore, except in the minority of high-conflict marriages it is better for the children if their parents stay together and work out their problems than if they divorce.