hey dm can you put up that video of that naked guy getting arrested? that guys penis was way smaller than a thumb.
Printable View
hey dm can you put up that video of that naked guy getting arrested? that guys penis was way smaller than a thumb.
The OP dumping the guy is just natural selection at work; we don't need the trait of micro penis in the gene pool.
So sanctuary, what characteristic do you possess that we need less of? I think we need less pompous asses, in the "gene Pool".
perry are you insecure or something? wtf is your trip with this?
If the OPs discription is acurate, then this guy is a bad mating choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Only-virgins [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
First a penis of that size is a real abnormality, this is a sign of faulty DNA.
Second, he came before he even got it in! If that trait is passes down you're tossing youself out of the gene pool.
Third, a man who sucks in bed is going to get less chances to impregnate a woman (we ain't going back for seconds KWIM).
All in all bad choice for a breeding partner on a purely biological level.
(p.s. I'm a woman, so you took issue with "HER last line" ;) )
There's no douchebag gene that I know of, but to answer your question: I'm short (5'6"-5'7").Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryville [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Seriously, how can you even put up with that as a girl lol. All fun for Jack and none for Jill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Heratriumphant
we don't need less short people. there's a lot of food and shelter on the ground.
To shallowness, we now add pseudo-science, (DNA, Gene pools, natural selection, whatever). This post is becoming ridiculous, Bye-bye.
Are you a creationist?Quote:
Originally Posted by Perryville [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Perryville, for a sex god of a man you sure get uptight about women demanding satisfaction.
oh yeah i forgot. perry is a holy roller and here we are talking darwinism. how dare us.
oh and this is far from psuedo science. darwins theory has been tested and shown true over and over and over again.
much unlike religious beliefs.
god forbid we even question religious beliefs. that's just rude.
You know, more and more this thread is begging for pictures. :evil:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanctuary [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
I don't seem to be the one with the problem. I never in any of my posts mentioned religion, Darwinism, creationism, or that I believe that women should not be satisfied, sexually. If you can find any such references , let me know. People seem to be more interested in putting words in my mouth, that I didn't say, instead of addressing my legitimate questioning of shallow behavior. For the record, I am not religious, and am a confirmed believer in natural selection, in a valid scientific context. To use some kind of half-assed genetic mumblings, to justify shallow and callous behavior, speaks much more about the posters, than it does about me.