Originally Posted by
doppelgaenger
[Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Here are some statistics you may wanna check up on. This one is a little outdated, but if you care enough to really find out, feel free to do your own research:
[url=http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/USA/]U.S. Circumcision Statistics[/url]
Rates of circumcision at birth have been rapidly declining for the last two decades, because of the awareness of how truly abhorrent it is. I would estimate that the majority of newborn boys born in the USA this year who were circumcised is less than 35%. You would probably find that roughly 60% of men born in the USA in the 80s (our generation) are cut. If you took each age group into consideration, along with the percentage of circumcised men, all by the decade, and totaled everything out, sure, you'd likely find that more than half are cut. But this is irrelevant. It's like saying that because there are a lot of people who smoke, it's healthy and okay to smoke. It doesn't make logical sense. You didn't specifically say that this is your way of justifying your preference for circumcised men, but I'll venture a guess that it is.