Mini696 you speak of medical "proof"...LOL
Routine neonatal (infantile) circumcision is not medically indicated by the American Medical Association. The Canadian Medical Association has deemed it a "crude" and "obsolete" procedure.
Why is it obsolete? The US, Israel, and South Korea are the only countries who routinely circ. babies shortly after birth.
Why is it necessary? In the early 1900s there was question as to whether every home across the country would have running water. Without running water, intact males would not be able to wash under the foreskin daily. A few prominent Jewish doctors realized and sold the idea that this could prevent an infection (balantitis). Nowadays we have ample running water.
Isn't it necessary for a tight foreskin? No! That is nonsense..lol. Just because its tight doesn't mean you cut it off and get desensitized. Mini696 your logic is amusing..If you had a headache would you cut of your head? lol. A tight foreskin that does not pass over the glans is known as phimosis, and it occurs in less than 2% of the intact population. Thats certainly not enough to justify the cutting of all baby males.
Oh, and by the way... ask any urologist. For phimosis they will prescribe steroid creams to help with stretching, or a less invasive surgery such as a prepuital plasty or a dorsal slit. For balantitis: Yes a circ. is indicated.
Mini696 please tell me why circs. are medicaly indicated. Verify your facts. Or post again.. afterall I could use some free comedy.![]()

I've been told by more than one partner that the extra surface "texture" on the back half of the head that doesnt get worn smooth by fabric or pants adds a bit of feeling as well, which from a womans perspective sounded like a good thing. The full uncut people can build more "mileage" by lots and lots of abusive masturbation with a quality handsoap that incorporates pumice (Gojo, LAVA, etc...) which is always a fun past time
lol


