
Originally Posted by
vashti
Also, I recommend against assuming that no matter what your career is, you MUST be more successful than the woman you are trying to talk to. That is rather arrogant, and besides, we all know the world hates lawyers.
I said no such thing.. but it just happens to be the case that women I meet don't have their future as carefully & realistically planned out..
Given, you get the aspiring.. actresses/prefomers/artists/writers/musicians/models/dancers/teachers/etc..
But even from the more educated breed.. lawyers (constitutional law, international law), doctors (pediatrics), dentists (general)
with the exception of pediatrics & general dentistry, the legal specializations these women pick don't reasonably add up to a stable high-paying job in the future.. and when you slowly peel the layers off of their future plans, you start to realize that they're not independent at all.. in fact, their future is heavily dependent on them finding a guy to support them.. as for the "dreamers", with the exception of NYC teachers which get paid well over ($70k) annually with full-health insurance and the largest state retirement pension fund; it goes unsaid that their future plans are heavily dependent on finding that guy to make up for their lake of determination, willpower, and ambition..
Not that I mind; I mean, I do.. but given the numbers.. it's actually rare to find a woman who takes her financial future and independence seriously.. to the hard & cold reality is that women in New York fiddle with "dreams" until they find some guy who isn't.. That only works in my favor as time goes on; and the luxury of choice becomes even more broader.. (but that's an entirely different conversational thread)
I also actually like taking care of the other person.. But that doesn't mean that I prefer them to be less financially successful/independent than myself.. Yeah, women like someone to take care of them, and guys like to take care of someone, but the reality is, that in NYC, both people need to be working (and not some BS job), to be providing well for their family, AND accumulating enough equity by age 40.. by age 50, college is around the corner, and it should be able to easily be financed, a steady cashflow should be maintained to pay off for the primary residence and any investment properties (which hopefully leave a positive cashflow).. that's a solid plan; but if the guy is the only earning-asset in the family, that's a plan that will be materialized after age 60, when it's too late..
Last edited by GrkScorp; 20-01-08 at 03:26 AM.
If you can't stop the Wind, then you can't stop the Storm.