Holy shit.
I thought I played a lot of videogames, he has a gamerscore of more than twice mine.
Holy shit.
I thought I played a lot of videogames, he has a gamerscore of more than twice mine.
aaaaajahahaaa he's trying to do that art of seduction thing these guys are always talking about. pua or something.
baby ya hustle. but me i hustle harder.
I put up a pic with my hair black. I just took it.![]()
..::.*Love is giving someone the ability to break your heart but trusting them not to*.::..
Holy crap, I came back and this thread exploded.
Best one in a while tho. Heavy is a riot.
DM, dont cry. You know you are still our #1 nerd around here.![]()
With a score like that, I can't tell if heavy is more interested in videogames or PUA.
Relax... I'll need some information first. Just the basic facts - can you show me where it hurts?
So let me get this straight- I'm crying because I called out bullshit on something you thought WASN'T bullshit, when it actually was? Clearly the guy copy and pasted that (it doesn't even answer boobaas question), but you in all your infinite wisdom couldn't recognize it for what it was
You just took a big bite out of that because you were so impressed with all that he posted, and that he was so smart enough to have the Oort cloud mentioned in his profile. Clearly he is a genius
Yes boobaa, it is. xy = yx does not have just the solutions 2 and 4. That is pure bullshit. You also claimed before that there was a proof showing 1 + 1 does not equal 2 or something ridiculous like that
Last edited by DoesntMatter; 18-12-08 at 01:04 AM.
But anyways my question still stands-
If you are familiar with diffeomorphisms then you are also familiar with isomorphisms so this is my question:
Given the transformation T from R(2 x 2) (the space of all 2 x 2 matrices) to P4 (the space of all polynomials of degree less than or equal to 4), where T is defined as:
Find a linear subspace we'll call V in R(2 x 2) and W of P4, both of dimension 3, such that T: V --> W is an isomorphism
Seriously, if this guy wasn't full of shit he would have answered it already, which he didn't. The problem is actually rather easy and won't take a page long post, more like several lines
Last edited by DoesntMatter; 18-12-08 at 01:07 AM.
dm's math god status is being threatened.
baby ya hustle. but me i hustle harder.
No misombra, I'm doing this because I can't believe how easily everyone fell for that
Instead of claiming I'm doing this out of ego, how about looking at what people actually said and if it has meaning or is true? How about that?
Especially Indi. I can't believe how easily she fell for that
The guy earlier basically admitted to copying and pasting, gave a ridiculously long answer to something that didn't even answer the question and would have taken a hell of a lot of time to write out, and then completely ignored my post about isomorphisms which should be cake if he is familiar with diffeomorphisms which he clearly is claiming to be. Yet my question wasn't one that could be googled like both of boobaas questions were. He just ignored answering a simple question that could take 3 or 4 lines to answer
Last edited by DoesntMatter; 18-12-08 at 01:21 AM.
OK Boobaa you stupid fuccking idiot bastard, I just googled a piece of Heavys response and found multiple sites where he copy and pasted it from
But the reason YOU'RE a little bastard is because you didn't mean to write xy = yx, you meant to write x^y = y^x, an EXPONENTIAL function you stupid fuccking twat, get your shit straight
But anyways (where he copy and pasted from)-
[url]http://www.qbyte.org/puzzles/p048s.html[/url]
I can't believe how dumb some of you are to think that guy didn't just copy and paste. For crying out loud, boobaa WROTE THE QUESTION COMPLETELY FUCCKING WRONG
Fuccking idiots
Last edited by DoesntMatter; 18-12-08 at 01:31 AM.
lol. dm just put yalls in check.
baby ya hustle. but me i hustle harder.
Nope, I meant what I copied. The puzzle still stands as it was in my post. There is a reason I posted this. Oh, and that 1+1 thing can be solved with 6'th grade mathemathics, you only have to think outside of frames a little bit. Its kind of mathematical joke, for nerds like you. Some may claim this method wrong, some may not, since it involves x and y which both are 1. Its just that x can be number of apples in your pocket and y can be number of apples in my pocket.
1) a and b, a=b
2)
a2=ab
3)lets do minus b2
a2-b2=ab-b2
4)a2-b2=ab-b2 > (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
5)eliminate (a-b)
(a+b)=b
if a=b ja b=1, then 1+1=1
Anyway, one more way should be out there, using similar methods.
But yes, I am not a mathematical genius like you, in fact, I quite suck at math. Happy?
Last edited by boobaa; 18-12-08 at 04:13 AM.
Don't expect anything.