Oh, so everybody's rules apply here, all at the same time? No ****ing way. Touching inappropriately is disrespectful, and there are pretty clear regional standards for what's appropriate.
Oh, so everybody's rules apply here, all at the same time? No ****ing way. Touching inappropriately is disrespectful, and there are pretty clear regional standards for what's appropriate.
Spammer Spanker
Like I said, I frankly don't give a damn about people's culture. My personal space trumps it. Invade at your own risk. I'm not the one initiating contact. I'm not initiating anything. MY personal "culture" involves no touching. How dare someone else infringe upon it. Eat with all the chopsticks you want, hug and kiss your Russian friends, so on and so forth. That's none of my business and none of my concern. However, do not attempt to force your culture on me. That's where we have a problem.
Furthermore, I would say that America most certainly has developed its own culture. You take people from anywhere in the world, you stick them in the US, give it a couple of generations and the children all start popping out in roughly the same few categories regardless of their ancestor's origins. That's our culture now. It's a homogenized hodepodge of other cultures rolled into one and no particular originating thread (outside religion) is taken too seriously. Which is a good thing. It means we're working toward a country of American citizens. Not a splintered collection of Mexicans, Italians, Chinese and so forth huddled together uneasily on the same soil.
Last edited by Gribble; 31-01-09 at 02:47 AM.
God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance.
-Mark Twain
If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
-Albert Einstein
Actually, culture wise it is best to observe the customs of the other person. Thus if in their culture it is not appropriate to touch, you don't touch.
As for "Original People's" culture. That would probably apply if this were say, Mexico. Where the Spanish intermixed with the aborigine people. Versus say, the US where the British basically supplanted the indigenous population.
Or should we accept that if in say, Hispanic culture calling someone a puto is punishable by death, that if they kill you it's OK, because it's part of their culture? When a machete wielding Hutu murders my Tutsi neighbor I should be OK with it, because it's a part of their culture? That when a Sunni woman's vagina is mutilated against her will because it's a part of her family's culture?
Last edited by Lite; 31-01-09 at 02:25 AM.
"Well, then," the Cat went on, "you see a dog growls when it's angry, and wags its tail when it's pleased. Now I growl when I'm pleased, and wag my tail when I'm angry. Therefore I'm mad."
Rationally developed opinions are extreme these days? I guess that isn't terribly surprising.
God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance.
-Mark Twain
If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
-Albert Einstein
That's why, oh why. And no need to use it to add drama to your statement. It doesn't actually add anything useful to the discussion.
I'm just curious where you draw the line? If a person feels violated by you touching them, are you wrong for touching them, or are are they wrong for not kicking you in the clam for touching them?
Besides, if you don't defend the extremes then eventually the moderate becomes the extreme. It's just part of how our government works. Back in the 50's when people weren't morally strong enough to stand up with people who had communist leanings they were harassed, blackballed, blackmailed, and jailed. During WWII when people weren't morally strong enough to stand up with people of Japanese origin we had them put into internment camps, yet Russians, Italians, and Germans did not experience this treatment even with their involvement in the fighting. (Yes, I know Russia eventually switched sides after the Germans betrayed them.)
I'm just curious. Where do you draw the line? If I came from a society that treated women like objects that I could stone if they showed a bare ankle, saw you in a bikini and started tossing rocks at you. Would you be OK with it in the sense of cultural openness and acceptance?
Last edited by Lite; 31-01-09 at 03:17 AM.
"Well, then," the Cat went on, "you see a dog growls when it's angry, and wags its tail when it's pleased. Now I growl when I'm pleased, and wag my tail when I'm angry. Therefore I'm mad."
at this point of the conversaion all i hear is blah blah blah
The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness, can be trained to do most things
God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance.
-Mark Twain
If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
-Albert Einstein
"Well, then," the Cat went on, "you see a dog growls when it's angry, and wags its tail when it's pleased. Now I growl when I'm pleased, and wag my tail when I'm angry. Therefore I'm mad."
It would appear that you are as ignorant as you are cowardly. I'll do us both a favor and overlook your posts in the future. Clearly you aren't capable of intelligent discourse. Either you ignore disagreement or shift the subject.
God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance.
-Mark Twain
If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
-Albert Einstein