
Originally Posted by
BackUpOrGetStng
I agree with splitting possessions that were acquired while the two were together, but alimony makes me want to vomit. Why should someone be continually obligated share the 'fruits of their labor' to maintain the standard of living of someone they no longer have a connection to?
As Vashti said, "He may have made the cash, but (usually) the wife raises the kids and keeps the home up, arranges the family social life, maintains family connections, etc.. Each person is contributing in a different way..", and I agree, but he was footing the bill during that time. Now he's footing her bills and she's not doing anything; she should have to keep cleaning his house and doing his laundry to keep things fair shouldn't she?
Because its not just about raising kids, cooking and cleaning. What if the partner who stayed home to do this gave up all those years of career investment to do so? You seriously expect that partner to simply go out and take a minimum wage job to pay the bills when their spouse is making 6-figures and was supported at home to do so? Do you really think an MD, MBA, PhD or JD just gets to walk into a high-income position after being at home for a decade or so?
It really depends on the couple. If a guy with a professional degree stays home while his high-powered lawyer wife brings home the bacon, and then dumps Mr. Mom at some point, he is certainly entitled to her alimony. And vice-versa.
BTW, this issue is one of the reasons guys are now finding it so hard to find a 'traditional' woman to stay home and raise kids.
Second thoughts can generally be amended with judicious action; injudicious actions can seldom be recovered with second thoughts.
--Cyteen by C.J.Cherryh