Trimming my nose hair. Ask me anything.

[HeavyArtillery]

Yes, assuming he didn't simply control-C, control-V into Google.

Just like the asker of the question.

[IndiReloaded]

Yes, assuming he didn't simply control-C, control-V into Google.

I doubt it. This guy mentions the Oort cloud. Astrophysicist? He should be charging DM & Boobaa for tutoring.

Anyway:

*SWOON*

[DoesntMatter]

He should be charging DM & Boobaa for tutoring.

Awwwwwwww shit

But what was up with that one page response to xy = yx for y > x?

Not only would any REAL number of x or y satisfy that equality, so would any IMAGINARY or COMPLEX number

[IndiReloaded]

He discussed imaginary solutions, DM (I think) when he used 'i'.

[DoesntMatter]

What I'm saying is all of that writing is just a massive diarrhea dump because it isn't needed and I can't be bothered to go through it after the first 2 lines given what the question was

Because any complex number is a solution to that

And boobaas bit about 2 and 4 being the only real solutions or whatever.... what the fucck is that?

I can't comment on that other question boobaa had because I'm not familiar with manifolds. However my suitemate who is currently in his room just took a class on manifolds and I'm sure he wouldn't mind taking a gander at it

[IndiReloaded]

Noone was asking you, DM, so no worries. Seems like Heavy has go it covered.

[DoesntMatter]

Did you understand what he wrote? Or did it just look like a lot?

Because either I'm missing something very key or that was a huge dump of bullshit

[IndiReloaded]

I think I understood the first part, the 'parametric' solution (which just means you make some basic assumptions) & the math was basically a lot of substitution, but I got lost on the rest.

Of course, I'm not a mathematician & I'm a couple decades out, besides. But even the rest didn't look like complete BS. Tho he DID leave out the QED at the end.

If you want to check if it was grabbed, just cut paste each solution section into Google & you'll find which ever profs site has the proof.

[DoesntMatter]

OK I really want to know what was up with 2 and 4 being the only solutions to that. Because boobaa asked Heavy to prove it and he responded by proving something else, and in either case that was just really weird

But if you are familiar with diffeomorphisms then you are also familiar with isomorphisms so this is my question:

Given the transformation T from R(2 x 2) (the space of all 2 x 2 matrices) to P4 (the space of all polynomials of degree less than or equal to 4), where T is defined as:



Find a linear subspace we'll call V in R(2 x 2) and W of P4, both of dimension 3, such that T: V --> W is an isomorphism

[DoesntMatter]

If you want to check if it was grabbed, just cut paste each solution section into Google & you'll find which ever profs site has the proof.

No, I want to know if he wasn't just writing random shit down, because if he wasn't then I have no idea what is going on and want to fix that

Because boobaa first said for him to prove 2 and 4 were the only solutions, which was clearly bullshit. And then Heavy didn't say a THING about that being wrong and just went into a bunch of equalities

And I don't mean to be a dick with my question. I just want to see if you aren't trying to make me go insane and are for real!

[vashti]

I don't care about math (sorry DM). What I want to know is why grown men play video games like a 12 year old.

[DoesntMatter]

I don't care about math (sorry DM). What I want to know is why grown men play video games like a 12 year old.

Math is just the greatest kryptonite for premeds which is good enough reason by itself to like it

[vashti]

I'll leave the advanced math for you pre-meds, then.

[DoesntMatter]

Someone just verify, WHAT the fucck am I missing!??

[HeavyArtillery]

I don't care about math (sorry DM). What I want to know is why grown men play video games like a 12 year old.

Cause videogames are awesome. They don't talk back, you don't have to take them out to dinner or listen to them complain. They don't pms and aren't moody.