
Originally Posted by
nomas
Let me get this straight.. Nestle is going into underdeveloped countries, misinforming mothers into switching to powdered milk substitute for feeding their babies. Then when there is no turning back (mother's body stops producing breastmilk) they turn around and sell it?
Well...yes. Nestle target these people because they will be easily persuaded and once their breastmilk dries up theyll have no choice but to keep buying the powder even though they cant really afford it and are putting their babies lives at risk.

Originally Posted by
nomas
If this is the case..yes, it's an unethical tactic to selling their product but if, as you claim, Nestle is already making lots of money..why would they go into a POOR country to try and squeeze a few bucks out of poor people when they could target the pockets of wealthier consumers in first world countries? It is true that the poor tend to be less educated and therefore more gullible, but I don't know..I think there's more money to be made if you focused on a different demographic.
Well maybe that is true. However the fact remains that they are getting as much money as they can from poorer countries despite already making millions elsewhere.

Originally Posted by
nomas
Also, there are many, MANY companies who partake in unethical business practices to sell their things and some are way more harmful..especially drug companies testing on animals AND poor people. Those, I believe, should be the ones being exposed because I don't know that this is actually destroying lives. Babies can grow up on formula feeding..I don't know that this is a life-saving effort.
Yes babies can grow up on formula feeding. But the powder that Nestle give mothers in third world countries obviously has to be mixed with water and Nestle know that the only water they have access to is dirty and probably full of diseases. The babies are still young and their immune systems have not yet developed so they cannot respond to the dirty water which means they are 25 times more likely to die. Obviously one solution would be to clean the water or educate the mothers but we just dont have the resources to do that. The World Health Organisation are doing all they can but this is still a huge problem.
Unfortunately you are right about the fact that so many other countries also are unethical, however right now I am focusing on Nestle because I know that if action was taken against Nestle or if the boycott became so much that Nestle were forced to change their ways, a number of other companies would take the hint and change their ways too because it would only be a matter of time until they got the same treatment.
"When I was 4 years old, they tried to test my IQ.
They showed me this picture of 3 oranges and a
pear. They asked me which one was different and
did not belong. They taught me different was
wrong."
- Ani DiFranco -