Originally Posted by
Wakeup
Well this is how they should operate and that's what this whole thread has been about. It's about her lack of integrity in pursuing (thanks for the spelling correction) that most of us have been replying to. No one said he wasn't at fault.
That was my point If all the enablers stopped enabling cheaters to cheat then they wouldn't have anyone to be practicing infidelity with. If there was no one else then they couldn't. The scenerio is unlikely, but for the sake of this thread it makes sense. Had she not asked to meet him, then she would not be pining away for a man that she had no business even being with.
Yes, but that's a lot of IFs and is inconsistent with the reality of how humans operate, presently and historically. But I agree that one can only control oneself, which is what she seems to be struggling with. The fact that it IS a struggle in her case, and not in his, says potentially good things about her character. You tend to get what you expect from people, is my point.
So if we want murderers to learn not to murder we should ask them to kill someone so that they are punished for it and learn a lesson? Over-the-top analogy, but I think you get my point?
I get it, but its not really my point. The fact that we charge people for *attempted* murder might be more relevant.
I understand that you think a single person is not doing anything wrong by aiding and abetting a cheater to cheat. Somehow I don't think you'd be so understanding of this someone, if this someone was the one that was going after your SO.
Thank you. I guess we agree to disagree
No, I didn't say she wasn't wrong (sorry for the dbl neg). But I do admire her recognizing the problem and wanting to do something about it. As for my husband, actually I would be more concerned about his behaviour than the intruding woman in such a hypothetical situation. Of course, my attitude might be the reason I've never had to deal with this scenario.
I think, on average, I just tend to be more solution-focussed than blame-focussed and much more pragmatic about drivers of human behaviour.
We could go back and forth forever.
Agree. I simply want the OP to know that there is value in trying to be better (else as you say she wouldn't have posted) and not everyone will dump on her for her effort. The past is so damned useless except as a source of data for moving forward.
Second thoughts can generally be amended with judicious action; injudicious actions can seldom be recovered with second thoughts.
--Cyteen by C.J.Cherryh