But you can turn a housewife into a Ho. Yea baby.
But you can turn a housewife into a Ho. Yea baby.
"Oh Lord it's hard to be humble, when you're perfect in every way. I can't wait to look in the mirror, cause I get better loking each day. To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man. Oh Lord it's hard to be humble, but I'm doing the best that I can." Mac Davis
Neo, I'm really sorry, I think I probably fall into that 10% of women you find threatening: pretty and brilliant. Nevertheless, there are plenty of men and women who would disagree with what you are saying. You ARE expressing a double standard. You admitted it in your own words, as anyone reviewing your posts can see. Now all you are doing is trying to JUSTIFY your double standard, which I find boring.Originally Posted by NeoSeminole
I doubt I can change your mind. Anymore than certain open-minded individuals could alter certain deep-south white plantation owners mindsets about slavery. They also thought their thinking was completely justified. I could just as easily replace "guys and girls" in your above post with "blacks and whites" and have the same argument, I suspect. And I highly doubt you could tell me anything about biology and hardwiring that would be remotely relevant to this issue.
Fortunately, like slavery, arguments like yours about male & female human sexuality are quickly going the way of the dodo. It is only a matter of a few more generations. Good luck, Neo.
WOW - Bravo indi... that was a nice post.Originally Posted by indigosoul
Pass the popcorn, Tone. This is getting good.
Relax... I'll need some information first. Just the basic facts - can you show me where it hurts?
i'll get us some wine. i'm all in for indigo.
indigosoul, I never said I find attractive and smart women threatening. Where did you get that from? I said they are usually stuck up. You LF women love to put words in my mouth. I will add you to the list with vashti and rosebud. Your argument about numbers means nothing to me. The most widely practiced religion in the world is islam. So? I'm sure there are also plenty of men and women who would agree with me. See where this is going?
Show me how I'm expressing any more of a double-standard than guys fighting in WWII and Vietnam while women stayed home. Or how women are allowed to play in men's sports if they are really good but if men suck, they aren't allowed to play in women's sports. I'm not complaining about either b/c guys and girls are different. You try to pretend they are the same.
I doubt you will change my mind also b/c you are trying hard to be idealistic in a world that is anything but ideal. Sure what you say may sound nice, but you aren't analyzing the whole situation. If you think you can replace the words "guys" and "girls" in my post with "blacks" and "whites," go ahead. I challenge you to b/c I know the two are irrelevant. One situation is based on evolution and biology, and the other on racism and hatred. Good luck.
Last edited by NeoSeminole; 31-01-06 at 07:54 AM.
UH, lets think here. The reason more men fight in wars than women is because men don't let them. It's been barely a decade since women have actually been allowed to enter active combat. So that's one hell of a dumb situation, as men are the ones who haven't let women fight historically, not the fact that women haven't wanted to. Also, women are allowed to play in mens sports if they're good, because men ARE, on average, naturally more physically fit. No woman would argue that. Its because when you give women 10000 years of housework in their genes, and men 10000 of manual labor, guess which one will be stronger.
This IS a double standard. Are you really so pathetic to say "well women should be able to close their legs. But me? Well damn, I'm horny! I gotta work so hard to get it!" Uh, bullshit. For one, if we're so amazing, how about we just say NO? Or maybe, I don't know, MEN could be the ones expected to wait til relationships, as THEY are the ones who are traditionally expected to start them, anyway. Men are endowed with the natural right to use women, but not the other way around? That's dumb. You're either going to do it, or you're not. If you have a one night stand, I think you did something wrong despite what sex you are. Because behind being men or women or black or white, we are ONE thing, and that is PEOPLE. So we are expected to act as good, moral PEOPLE.
AND ONE MORE THING: If men can have sex promiscuously, but women can't.... who are the men supposed to have sex with? Other men?![]()
I'm drowning in assholes.
Actually, no, I'm not following at all. Please DO explain how you feel how men and women's equality (or lack of) in Islamic countries contributes to your argument.Originally Posted by NeoSeminole
Where did I say that men and women weren't different? Where did I say that they are the same? Please show me that post b/c I don't believe I actually said that. What I DO say is that, in the case of sexual equality b/t men and women in modern Western society, that biological differences do not consistute grounds for discrimination. You are the one holding the double standard, demonstrated amply in your previous posts (go back and read them Neo, no one else seems to have any problem understanding what you've said). So the onus is on YOU to explain why you think such a double standard is justified.Originally Posted by NeoSeminole
OK, Neo, if you feel you want to make your arguments on evolution and biology, go for it, let's hear what you think. At the moment, the ONLY arguments I HAVE seen are exactly racism (bordering on misogyny) and hatred (your posts about women have NOT been flattering). I am ALWAYS prepared to learn something. But lets hear some FACTS, man. And ones that address the PRESENT biological situation, not how we were 1 million years ago when one of my ancestors sat behind one of yours picking the bugs out of your scalp. Please make sure your points include explanations that account for modern reproductive control practices such as the birth control pill.Originally Posted by NeoSeminole
![]()
Last edited by indigosoul; 31-01-06 at 08:23 AM.
Ooops! Just saw this. Sorry Neo, my bad. Apologies for the misquote. You said they are stuck up. That's much better...Originally Posted by NeoSeminole
![]()
Neo, before we get too involved, I thought you might like to read this somewhat related post (and perhaps the rest of the thread.) Its from a while back when Nomas, I, and others were arguing about monogamy in modern biology:
[url]http://www.loveforum.net/showpost.php?p=95266&postcount=38[/url]
Personally, I'm equally proficient in either extreme. Just depends on which head I let take the lead.
Last edited by whaywardj; 31-01-06 at 08:49 AM.
Speak less. Say more.
Hi Hayward, okay.... explain, puh-leeze...Originally Posted by whaywardj
Oh... scheibe. Duh!
So, okay WHICH head is which. Do tell...
Last edited by indigosoul; 31-01-06 at 08:48 AM.
which one takes over most of the time?Originally Posted by whaywardj
Woah this thread has gotten deep.
LOL.... now SEE Neo, you could learn from Hayward!
He used ONE head to get TWO women asking about his other...![]()
There's someone who knows how to pass on his genes in modern biology!