lol You don't have to be in a relationship to have sex.
lol You don't have to be in a relationship to have sex.
I think marriage is because they want the paper (the official document they are together for life) not because they want to have kids. I know a couple that has been married for 14 years. They have no kids, nor did they ever want any in the first place.
If you can't handle the thorns, don't crave the rose!!
So what would have been the difference if they never got married? None.Originally Posted by Rosebud
[URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL]
Marriage is not about Kids Lloyd.... It's about Love!
If you can't handle the thorns, don't crave the rose!!
Marriage is not about kids or love.
It's just a business transaction conducted in old days to ensure that the continuity of contracts between two joining parties that do not even really revolve around kids or the two parties.
To answer the post, I think I'm so good looking.. oh... oh.. hmm.. oh wait, that's not my reflection, it's a poster of some other random hot chick...
"Ogres are like onions."
I'm not denying that; all I'm saying is there is no point to get married until you're ready to have kids; you can love each other and still live together.
[URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL]
You can have kids, love each other and just live together. You don't have to get married to have kids.
Yes you do; otherwise, they'd be bastards; plus for the kids sake is when you want to establish family, same last name etc.Originally Posted by Junsui
[URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL]
OK wait a minute here...Not your starting to hit a nerve LLoyd.... So your saying you HAVE to get married if you have kids with someone? you can't just live together and love each other and be happy? And by the way..what is wrong with kids being born out of wedlock???? please remind ME!
If you can't handle the thorns, don't crave the rose!!
don't you get tax breaks if you have kids and you're not married?
yes you do Sombra!Originally Posted by misombra
If you can't handle the thorns, don't crave the rose!!
Marriage is just stupid anyways.
No; you most likely would be filing jointly, and that could bump you into the next higher tax bracket.Originally Posted by misombra
[URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL]
Sorry to hit a nerve RB; You don't HAVE to get married; hell, you don't have to DO anything.Originally Posted by Rosebud
I'm saying that is the only reason to; everything else about it is just redtape.
Sure, you could just live together and be happy, but I find it less convenient all around to have the child's last name the father's, and the mother having a different one. And as far as I know, the father's name is the one the child takes, as long as he's on the birth certificate.
[URL=http://imageshack.us][/URL]
No honey... actually most woman chose the child to have their last name. If your not married you have the option of which last name you would like to use. I see what your sayign about it being the only reason to get married but that isn't always the best case for every person.
There is no convienance factor at all... It's all the same except you have a document and a couple of rings. we do the same things as any married couple would with our child, there would be no difference if we were married at all excpet we would have rings on our finger.
I'm done arguing now!
If you can't handle the thorns, don't crave the rose!!