Ladies: Cut or....uncut?

[mini696]

i personally think uncut is better. i don't mind cut i guess but if i ever have a son, i'm not going to cut off his foreskin i don't care about the so called "medical reasons" that's all a load of crap.

Unnnggghh
I thought we had already established that there ARE medical reasons. I feel sorry for your son if he NEEDS it done and you "don't care".

Mick

[Junket]

I feel sorry for your son if he NEEDS it done and you "don't care".

That's like sayin' it's safer to removes one's limbs in the case there are medical issues.

Circumcisions shouldn't be performed as a preventative procedure unless there's strong evidence that there will be future complications.

[misombra]

i'll tell you what. you show me this "relevent research" and then i will believe it when i see it. i'm a research assistant and telling me "research shows blah blah blah" is not enough for me.

[mini696]

That's like sayin' it's safer to removes one's limbs in the case there are medical issues.

ROLFLMFAO
Its nothing like that. Thats an immature response that has no relevance. I've never talked about it in a "just in case" manner. I'm talking about curing medical problems by cutting the foreskin.

Circumcisions shouldn't be performed as a preventative procedure unless there's strong evidence that there will be future complications.

Your 100% right. But you completely missed the point.

Not once did I mention it as a 'preventative procedure'. It should only be used as solution to a medical problem.

How would you like it if you couldn't pee because the foreskin was sealed over the top of you dick?? I doubt you'd be asking the doctor to leave it uncut when your back teeth are floating away.

Mick

[mini696]

i'll tell you what. you show me this "relevent research" and then i will believe it when i see it. i'm a research assistant and telling me "research shows blah blah blah" is not enough for me.

I hear what your saying... Research shows anything you want it to show.

But I'm not talking about research, I'm talking about actual events that HAVE occured, and I have seen from personal experience. Have you ever had to hold the hand of a three year old boy while he's peeing because he might pass out from the pain it causes?? He would actually hold on so long that it caused other problems. It would wake him up in the middle of the night when he wets the bed, and his penis is burning, from the urine coming out as such a high pressure.

Mick

[Junket]

It should only be used as solution to a medical problem.

That was my point!

We're trying to beat the same god damn point into eachother's skulls!

[mini696]

LOL seems like it hay.

Damn text.

[misombra]

I hear what your saying... Research shows anything you want it to show.

But I'm not talking about research, I'm talking about actual events that HAVE occured, and I have seen from personal experience. Have you ever had to hold the hand of a three year old boy while he's peeing because he might pass out from the pain it causes?? He would actually hold on so long that it caused other problems. It would wake him up in the middle of the night when he wets the bed, and his penis is burning, from the urine coming out as such a high pressure.

Mick

your personal experience is even less convincing than this research you're threatening me with.

[whaywardj]

i'll tell you what. you show me this "relevent research" and then i will believe it when i see it. i'm a research assistant and telling me "research shows blah blah blah" is not enough for me.

[url]http://www.medic8.com/healthguide/articles/circumcision.html[/url]

[misombra]

thanks hayward... interesting.

[Airborne]

[QUOTE=updraft]4) Uncut dicks apparently (according to my bf) have much more sensation
QUOTE]

This is not the case because when a man is erect the foreskin is pulled back anyway, so it makes no difference when it comes to sensation.

[mini696]

You feel threatened by that? Where's the threat Misombra? This is pathetic.

[misombra]

lol, it's okay man. take a breath.

[mini696]

lol, it's okay man. take a breath.

*aaahhhhh*
1, 2, 3, 4....
*phewww*

I;m all better now....

[whaywardj]

[QUOTE=Airborne]

4) Uncut dicks apparently (according to my bf) have much more sensation
QUOTE]

This is not the case because when a man is erect the foreskin is pulled back anyway, so it makes no difference when it comes to sensation.

No, that's not altogether right, Airborne. The foreskin covering the glans when the penis is flacid is what keeps the glans relatively more sensitive since it is less exposed to events like constant rubbing against fabric. Yes, the glans is exposed in an erect penis, cut or not. But the glans which is covered by foreskin most of time is more sensitive than one which isn't.

The counter argument is that a girl can get more mileage out of a cut dick than an uncut one precisely BECAUSE it is less sensitive.