+ Follow This Topic
Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 147

Thread: Metrosexuals?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    345
    The careless attitude for the respect of the oval office, lying directly to a grand jury, and to the nation, and being an obvious womanizer, and have it defended here is appalling.

    Politics is a religion, but if you are a student of history, you will see that the DNC has been on the wrong side of history for the last 100 years.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    15,440
    what do you mean "the wrong side of history?"

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    7,098
    hahaha - bluevette, now I know where you spend the rest of your time - searching the Republican conspiracy websites and blogs! hahahaha

    Offhand I would say that Roosevelt was a FANTASTIC Democratic President, and the Republicans have put us on the significantly wrong side of history very recently, for which we may need decades to recover...

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    7,098
    Quote Originally Posted by misombra
    what do you mean "the wrong side of history?"
    you know misombra - controversial things like the civil rights movement, equal rights for women, education, increased minimum wages, seeking healthcare for the poor, staying out of Iraq, etc...

    ::major eye rolling::

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    3,490
    wow lol it turned into a political thread

  6. #66
    indigosoul's Avatar
    indigosoul Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluevetteracer
    The careless attitude for the respect of the oval office, lying directly to a grand jury, and to the nation, and being an obvious womanizer, and have it defended here is appalling.

    Politics is a religion, but if you are a student of history, you will see that the DNC has been on the wrong side of history for the last 100 years.
    Vette, you list was impressive, and I'm NOT saying you're right or wrong (just in case Clinton or the SS reads this)

    But, you have to remember just HOW MANY ppl the Clintons knew, directly and by association. I myself know a few ppl personally who have died; as we get older this number goes up. I work in a profession where I see a LOT of people daily, so that number will go up even more, probably more than your average joe. You could generate a similar, tho certainly less impressive, list about me.

    The Queen of England could almost certainly generate a similar list... does it mean she offed all those ppl? Well, except for Diana, probably not. Or Oprah could, certainly, if you dislike the Queen. You have to normalize your facts based on the sheer number of ppl public figures actually know.

  7. #67
    indigosoul's Avatar
    indigosoul Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by whaywardj
    Okay. I'll start by offering two which came to me some years ago:

    1. mollicking

    2. worple

    I think I have a definition for the first. But the second eludes me.

    Any suggestions from the gang as to what the made-up words might/could mean?
    I cut and pasted these to the proper thread, W. I'll take a guess there.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Gender
    Male
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,665
    Quote Originally Posted by misombra
    what do you mean "the wrong side of history?"
    Don't encourage him, Misombra. He has all the answers.
    Speak less. Say more.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    4,497
    George W. will go down as one of, if not the, worst president in our history. It may not be right now that this is acknowledged, but I'm sure our kids, and kids kids, will be reading that in their history books.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    3,490
    I dont even know how this got into a Bush discussion lol. If Clinton is ever mentioned somehow Bush is brought up. I don't like Bush as a president. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I'm neither republican nor democrat, I just find it funny it somehow got turned into this. Bush may go down as the worst president, but others have been just as disliked during their presidencies. [url]http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46832[/url]

  11. #71
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    7,098
    I think worldnetdaily is considered a right-wing publication, and therefore biased...

    And I always hear Clinton sex scandals being brought up when people are being defensive about Bush. Maybe its just because they are the most recent presidents...

    And I, too, am neither Democrat or Republican. I am registered Independent.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    3,490
    It is, that's fine, it just had ratings of the past presidents Republican and Democrat. And no not all of the past republican presidents on there had high ratings according to them lol.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    4,497
    More money was spent (by a Republican congress) on investigating "Monicagate", then on the 9-11 Comission and it's review/investigation. go figure.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    3,490
    Probably so. Have you read about that bird flu? Do you think it will kill as many as they are predicting?

  15. #75
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    7,098
    Don't get me started...

Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Metrosexuals . . .
    By sfalexi in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 128
    Last Post: 27-05-04, 08:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •