Printable View
A student (turning 16) and a teacher (29) truly love each other and definatly don't sleep together.
The student is very ill and has 6 months to live.
Should be they together?
If not why, I mean they don't sleep together and they're happy together.
Is this breaking the law?
I say no. He's not 16 yet, first of all. You dont sleep together, but you could possibly sleep together. It is against the law until that boy is sixteen.
this is quite a funny post. Is the student you? If it is, then I am sorry. If the student has only 6 months to live then she should do what she wants but if she truely loves him she wouldn't torture him by being closer to him since she's going to die soon. After she dies, he would be heartbroken and who knows maybe he might even commit suicide. It would be incredibly selfish for the student to get closer to the student when she knows she is going to die soon.
The student is female and the teacher is male...
I know the girl because my older brother's her tutor and he tries to be a friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by lastwish [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Oh no, well if the student is the girl, if anyone was to find out, they will turn it into a much bigger deal than if the student was a boy. Dont pursue this unless you want to register as a sex offender.
No, it is not appropriate. A sixteen year old is not legally old enough to consent for a good reason. If the teacher encourages this type of thinking, he should be fired.
any adult who wants to start a relationship with a minor is breaking the law.
raverboy
The teacher would have about six minutes to live if I found out he was sniffing around my teenage daughter.
Yeah..., unless the female teacher is hot.. we all remember how that one played out in the media.. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by DharmicLove [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illusional [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Exactly. Not to mention immoral. I can't believe a 29 year old put in a position of trust would want to basically take advantage of a child. They shouldn't be teaching, and if I knew who they were I'd have them fired (and possibly beaten....).
A 16 year old and a 29 year old's idea of love are completely different. Although I doubt the 29 year old is 'in love' as much as he is infatuated with her and the idea of getting some hot young ass. Either that or he's extremely emotionally stunted.
So my answer is no, regardless of the circumstances, they should definitely not 'be together', even if she is dying. You don't get to do stupid or illegal/immoral things just before you're dying. Would you say it was okay for a man to cheat on his wife because he's dying??
It scares me how many stories like this seem to be coming out these days. I think I want to home school my kids, yeesh.
What do you mean by "Should they be together"? They don't sleep together and they're happy together already. Just wanted to clarify it, did you mean should they or not have sex or something else?Quote:
Originally Posted by anastasiastarz [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]