BP accused of 'buying academic silence'

[Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]

Quote:

---

The head of the American Association of Professors has accused BP of trying to "buy" the best scientists and academics to help its defence against litigation after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

"This is really one huge corporation trying to buy faculty silence in a comprehensive way," said Cary Nelson.

BP faces more than 300 lawsuits so far.

In a statement, BP says it has hired more than a dozen national and local scientists "with expertise in the resources of the Gulf of Mexico".

The BBC has obtained a copy of a contract offered to scientists by BP. It says that scientists cannot publish the research they do for BP or speak about the data for at least three years, or until the government gives the final approval to the company's restoration plan for the whole of the Gulf.

It also states scientists may perform research for other agencies as long as it does not conflict with the work they are doing for BP.

And it adds that scientists must take instructions from lawyers offering the contracts and other in-house counsel at BP.

Bob Shipp, the head of marine sciences at the University of South Alabama, was one of the scientists approached by BP's lawyers.

They didn't just want him, they wanted his whole department.

"They contacted me and said we would like to have your department interact to develop the best restoration plan possible after this oil spill," he said.

"We laid the ground rules - that any research we did, we would have to take total control of the data, transparency and the freedom to make those data available to other scientists and subject to peer review. They left and we never heard back from them."

What Mr Nelson is concerned about is BP's control over scientific research.

"Our ability to evaluate the disaster and write public policy and make decisions about it as a country can be impacted by the silence of the research scientists who are looking at conditions," he said.

"It's hugely destructive. I mean at some level, this is really BP versus the people of the United States."

In its statement, BP says it "does not place restrictions on academics speaking about scientific data".

more..

---

Source - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-10731408

it seems weird that all this shit press is coming out all at the same time about BP...libya prisoners, fake pictures and now this....what the what....

Surprised my alma mater isn't mentioned. UCBerkeley received $500M from BP two years ago.

These types of agreements are common when researchers accept private money. Happens all the time for biomedical research who get money from Pharma.

What I find appalling is that any of you (who aren't affiliated with a university) must pay for publications resulting from research funded with public money. Journals like Nature, Science, etc want you to pay for a copy of a paper. You paid for the data, you should be able to access it.

Fortunately, most researchers are publishing their papers on their own webspace. Google Scholar is getting very good at finding them. Score one for the Cloud. :D

so you agree (so called) science can be faked...for whatever reason:..money, pride..etc etc

I don't know what 'so called' science is. I only know good science and junk.

but that's what i'm insinuating, how do you tell the difference..people in science are so one sided and less open minded...saying 'it's science therefore it's fact' and yet this proves nothing is really true unless you test it yourself.

The data is out there for people to read and judge. Most are just too lazy to do it. So they judge based on their self-reinforcing opinion b/c its just too hard to read and think. Or they just want to complain and not really do anything about their Issue of the Day.

I've met all kinds of quacks who complain about Big Pharma, the government, space aliens and various other things they want to believe. Thank you, Dan Brown. :P But when you start questioning them on the source of their info and their depth of knowledge, its rarely from any true synthesis of the available information. But, boy, do they hate when you call them on it. LOL.