after we cut our dependency on oil, then we'll have to start cutting our dependency on food and water.
Printable View
after we cut our dependency on oil, then we'll have to start cutting our dependency on food and water.
Yeah, ****in america, wasters of the world. Bomb yourselves, world peace.
What's so wrong with spending money on alternative energy research, implementing it, and then other countries start copying us?
I understand the "we wasted money on this and they copy us without doing crap" mentality.
But this isn't some science fair project. This is the earth, and making the lives of the present and future generations better. Not to mention the future of our environment better.
That's exactly what I mean. Then you either die off or live off the land. Most people would die off because they actually depend on that stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by misombra [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Kudos zoso!Quote:
Originally Posted by zoso [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
ps>> I love Futurama
We need a Worldwide Energy Saving Program, period.
Now who's going to start it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by anachronistic [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
That is another good reason to cut dependency on oil. Less dependent people.
[url]http://www.ase.org/[/url]Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedel [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
I'm sure there are others.
It's quite interesting to spot how we depend on oil in so many ways other than as a fuel for cars. It wont all be solved by new transport alternatives.
To provide a bit of a devil's advocate view about it, the effects of oil scarcity and global warming has not yet reached any critical effects, so by forcing changes to be made in the present is morally repugnant because we are poorer than future generations than can deal with it then when it is actually needed.
In many other ways like plastic bags? I remember the old beginning of the nineties when Soviet Union collapsed, everything was still natural back then.
Oil is not necessary at all actually, its just a lazy way out. btw, do you know that those shiny candy wrappers cost more than candy itself, the basis is made from oil, then there is paint and glue, and this stuff never settles in soil. Thats also the reason why candy is getting smaller and smaller each year.
How can I boycott this world and still live? ****, it makes me angry. Worker class has no other choice but to go with the flow.
May I ask what recipients were they wrapped instead, Booba? That's interesting.
And, Indi, thanks for the link. I'll check it out.
I was thinking more along the lines of a good theocratic dictatorship after the dependance is cut. With 7 virtues written into law and Religious police to keep them enforced like in Saudi Arabia :DQuote:
Originally Posted by anachronistic [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
Stupid argument. I hope you were being facetious. That's like saying you shouldn't be immunized for a disease until its actually rampant. Or that you should only start exercising once you have heart problems & diabetes. B/c future generations *might* have a cure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lipp [Dear Guest/Member you have to reply to see the link.click here to register]
And I don't think we can say we haven't reached any 'critical effects' of global warming. Waiting until the tipping point might be too late.
Like I said...lazy people are dependent.
Ride a damn bike. Unless you're commuting some crazy miles, there's no reason not to.
Kill multiple birds with one stone, less gas consumption, less pollution, less congestion on the streets, and reduce obesity.
We are going to need to do some serious bike commuting to make up for our carbon footprint this year. Air travel is THE worst! :(