Let me make sure that everyone else understands these structures.
Dave's first post...
Quote:
There was this girl that was this formitable love-creature that I have had upon me in a tickling fancy matter but to this I will also tell you that I have largerly created this intercourse of this female in my own mind.
He thinks this girl is pretty and has fantasized about her.
Quote:
The other thing I will also tell you is that yon little love-female walks past the palm tree on her way to the food court. It has been traditioned I have observed by taking copious notes of her actions that she passes the handicapped man at the security desks to which I will also tell you that I left him a little note to be beseech the love-image of my female .
He notices that she frequently walks by the food court in the mall and always walks by the security guard so he dropped off a note for the guard to give to her when he sees her next.
My response...
Quote:
Damn that's a lot to decipher. Like a damned code almost. Well, here goes. . .
Well, should this small message encounter itself upon the image of beauty that is her, please allow those of us who are the third party to be informed of the repercussions of thy actions.
Remarking on his style of writing and responding in a similar fashion to let us know what happens if she receives his message.
Dave's response to MY response...
Quote:
To the favor of which you have enhanced my knowledge in it a criticismed-manner I will tell you that I, Dave thank you friends.
From time-to-time I have desires such as maybe just a little bit of a pearl-necklace and some maybe just some little bit of a dicklay and to those of you who BADGER me!!!!!, Dave about my use of this term, I will tell you that this is simply just what is refered to as a COLLOQUILISM and so maybe is not me that is umm in the dark BUT MAYBE IT IS ALL OF YOU who spend yon sat-urday sexual nites ona computer and internet, wait what a mad fancy this is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $$###())()******768*&&&
Dave sarcastically responding, once again in his style of writing, that I shouldn't have criticised his style of writing, that I should stop spending my saturday nights entertaining my sexual fantasies through the computer, and then flipping out for the remainder of the post as well.
Questions anyone? I know I have a few . . . like why hasn't he started up a "bipolar" thread of his own, for one . . .
Alexi