I'm sorry misombra.
I think our dictionary is different.
I'm a kind of guy who read Kahlil Gibran so much.
Love is love. It's the feeling in the heart.
Believe me, I can feel it.
I feel my heart rate change when I meet the woman I love
(and so far, only to two women).
In reverse, I also desperately miss her so much
when she is not around.
It's like a soul bonding.
So love, is there without me or her has to do anything.
On the contrary, you are saying about the actions like
cooking, tidying the house, etc.
So you count the actions as "love deposits",
that one should owe to.
IMHO, you discredit love as a "give" and "take" phenomenon.
For me, you are saying about marriage, not love.
So I believe that some people may have a happy marriage with
a spouse they don't love. Maybe because their spouse give
them 9 out of 10 of their physical and emotional needs.
However, in my world,
a true happy marriage can only happen if there is love.
On the other hand, love does not need a marriage.
It is there in the people that can feel it, with pure heart.
I wonder why not so many people see this way.