Ah. Thank you for the clarification. That actually makes a lot more sense the way you put it. In other words, from my view it was not a "transactional relationship." It was very much just a fair compromise, or a give and take in ONE situation. I suited her needs because I believe in a relationship, sometimes you do things not expecting to get anything in return but merely because you want to make the other happy. So, in general in a relationship, the only true "give and take" or "quid pro quo" I expect is really just the same respect in return. So, to me, I never intended it as a "I did this for you, now you have to do this for me." To me it was just, this is a relationship. I did something for her because that is what I do for my significant other.... yet in return she can't even do a fraction of the same for me.
So for her part, she TURNED it into an example of a transactional relationship, because she made it very much about "I'm only doing this for you because you did something for me." Except, even worse, she didn't bother to hold up her end of the so called "transaction." But, then, she never did. I definitely appreciate the way you explained further, as this actually makes a lot more sense to me now. I see the difference you are describing.
Apologies. Didn't mean to go off on a tangent. Sometimes I just have to vent. It feels sooooooooo good looking back on what a piece of garbage my ex was and thinking about my potential future. My God, even if I died alone, I'd be so much better off without her.