(I lent my wifi station to my brother so I was gone a while)
I don't know. I honestly just like getting stuck into discussions. Actually you're the only one who consistently offered thoughtful counter-arguments, so kudos to you.
the difference would be that vaccinations are (presumably) recommended by the AAP.
They can't possibly know, especially since the subject isn't a common one, so you can't know how many sexual problems should've been attributed to circumcision that were simply chalked up to bad luck.
However, I can't possibly know either. But I do know that when much less tissue and less nerves are removed from females, and they're still mostly able to have normal sexual function (and have decreased risk of UTI), it is suddenly considered a horrible practice.
Yes