silly "would you rather" thread

[starbuck]

Ladies, would you rather date a guy who looks like Johnny Depp, but unable to get it up? Or a guy who is physically unattractive to you, but awesome in bed?

Guys, for you it's Angelina Jolie, and she is frigid. And the other choice is a girl who is physically unattractive to you, but amazing in bed?

If you HAD to pick one, which would it be?

[Citycat]

I'd go for the first option and take Daniel Goddard with his 2000th look (I find him hotter than Johnny Depp) and have him implant penile prosthetic.

[DoesntMatter]

I would go for the girl that is amazing in bed

[DoesntMatter]

What about YOU starbuck? Who would YOU go for?

[starbuck]

I'd take the unattractive guy who is awesome in bed. We'd just have to do it with the lights out!

[anachronistic]

Sexy looking person. You can learn how to work it in bed, but the only way to make an ugly person look better is to put a paper bag over their head.

[Aegis]

Angelina Jolie; I was already with the second option and I ruined it because I simply wasn't interested in her.

Though, I think I'd prefer Claire Forlani or Kiera Knightly or Jennifer Connelly.

[Gribble]

All a woman has to do is lie perfectly still and it's still pretty damn good to me so I guess I'd go for the hottie.

[Asparagoose]

And the other choice is a girl who is physically unattractive to you, but amazing in bed?

What besides a woman's looks make her any good in bed? If she's physically unattractive, she's not any good in bed. I'm with Gribble. The unattractive girl stays home, the hottie stays in bed.

[DoesntMatter]

Hmmm, I may want to rethink what I said earlier. I guess sexual skill is only something that matters when it comes to the guys sexual skills

[starbuck]

If I truly loved someone, attractive or not, I could probably bear with them if they were having sexual problems or were a bad lover.

[Asparagoose]

I guess sexual skill is only something that matters when it comes to the guys sexual skills

You'll probably hear it a million times how "you just probably haven't met a woman who knows what she's doing" or "you've never been with a real woman yet". What's the difference? There is no difference. A girl can't be amazing in bed, she can only be horny and not incompetent. If she tries to stick her finger in my urethra, she's bad in bed. If she takes it in different places and doesn't act like an inhibited virgin, she's good in bed. No skill required.

Guys just have to learn positioning and rhythm. Some guys also need to stop being so nice and polite during sex. It's not a science, just loosen up and don't be afraid to let yourself be a man. I wouldn't go as far as to consider that skill. No skill required.

[Asparagoose]

If I truly loved someone, attractive or not, I could probably bear with them if they were having sexual problems

If you're talking about someone who is 50 or 60 years old, then I don't think sex will be an important part of your relationship by that time.

[miSSleepy]

Ladies, would you rather date a guy who looks like Johnny Depp, but unable to get it up? Or a guy who is physically unattractive to you, but awesome in bed?

I'd choose Johnny Depp look-alike and work on getting him up. I don't care how many times the physically unattractive guy will get it up if he can't turn me on.

[1averagejoe]

I'd **** the shit out of angelina jolie if she wasn't such a whore and weird. But I'd rather have a hotie that was terrible in bed, because as far as I'm aware I'm going to be terrible as well...I'm still a virgin.