What would you guys choose?

[Ric]

Lmao, I have to say that is funny. But no, I really do not find myself all that attracted to heavier girls. Someone not as thin as the first girl or thick as the second girl, somewhere in the middle. Thicker legs, more of an ass and bust, not as bony, no chicken wings for arms. I can not seem to find a picture of someone relatively close to what I am looking for physically. Honestly as far as weight, I would like someone between 125 at the bare minimum to 140 lbs which is healthy, not scrawny or heavy.

#1 is around 120 I think. Maybe 110, certainly not less.
#2 is more around 200, certainly not near the 140 lbs.

[UnknownSld]

#1 is around 120 I think. Maybe 110, certainly not less.
#2 is more around 200, certainly not near the 140 lbs.

Not to sure about #1, height factors in as well though since we do not know her height we can't be sure. As far as #2, she is probably closer to the weight of 160 to 180 lbs but surely not 200. I knew someone who was 200 lbs and she was quite a bit bigger than the girl in picture #2.

[Ric]

Not to sure about #1, height factors in as well though since we do not know her height we can't be sure. As far as #2, she is probably closer to the weight of 160 to 180 lbs but surely not 200. I knew someone who was 200 lbs and she was quite a bit bigger than the girl in picture #2.

Hmm, if I look up on google picture search "200 lbs woman" it shows women around the size of #2. But can't be sure as it doesn't show things well.
And, I'm no expert. xD

[UnknownSld]

Hmm, if I look up on google picture search "200 lbs woman" it shows women around the size of #2. But can't be sure as it doesn't show things well.
And, I'm no expert. xD

I do not claim to be an expert either so please don't think that I am. My information comes from personal trainers at my gym. Also, keep in mind you can google search for a woman around the weight of 135 lbs but still get some pictures of obese women.

[Mongoose]

How about... mystery option 4:



Phwoar!!

Try wrestling with that!


(It's a mystery, because it could be a man)

[UnknownSld]

How about... mystery option 4:



Phwoar!!

Try wrestling with that!

Hahahahahaha!!! No thank you I would rather not. Females like that make me wonder if they were born a man.

[doppelgaenger]

#1 is around 120 I think. Maybe 110, certainly not less.
#2 is more around 200, certainly not near the 140 lbs.

I'd say #1 is about 130 lbs. She seems kind of tall, that's why.

#2 and #3 are definitely fat in my book. Big fat fatties! Not going to deny, though, #2 is not ugly and she'd probably be really pretty if she lost her flabs... I dunno about the rest of the guys, but I like slender girls. I dated a girl who was 160 once, but she was about 5'10 and had a nice rack. It was kind of pushing my limits, and she gained more weight during the course of our relationship and I started to lose interest in her because of that [and for other reasons].

I tend to like skinny girls with long legs and perky breasts...

During my first year of college, I was with a girl who looks a lot like #1 with the same personality that you've attributed to her. She was fun while she lasted, and I don't regret it at all. I still know her and bump into her from time to time... she's just a lot trashier than she used to be.... I spoiled her:

[Regnent]

How about... mystery option 4:

Phwoar!!

Try wrestling with that!


(It's a mystery, because it could be a man)

Aw. common. Seriously. Shit like that gives me nightmares, and causes my testicles to ascend.

[UnknownSld]

Aw. common. Seriously. Shit like that gives me nightmares, and causes my testicles to ascend.

Haha, that is hilarious.

Dopellgaenger, I agree she is very pretty, however I just do not like girls who are toothpick bony. This is my previous girlfriend, after we broke up I was shown by a mutual friend some of her pictures she put on her profile wearing nothing but a tiny bikini. I realized then, she was not as physically attractive as I once thought. Especially, due to the fact that I realized she was very trashy and slutty. Honestly, if you're (meaning her) dating a guy and go off for a four day weekend having threesomes the whole time, you are pretty slutty.

[xxazurexx]

Looks initially attract.....you need to get over that fact and accept it.

How can we judge based soley upon personality and traits and when we don't know this person prior to the physical attraction???

Looks are the FIRST thing we see and we are either attracted or we are not. Looks are the 'deciding' factor as to whether we want to pursue this person and get to know them. We have to be attracted physically/sexually and to have a desire to get to know them.

If physical and sexual attraction didn't matter...we could all go around shagging just ANYBODY and nobody would be without a partner.....it doesn't work that way.

Personality and traits, etc, comes SECOND to looks and if the personality doesn't match up, then few, either men or women, would remain in a relationship based solely upon LUST.

What a joke....most men would go immediately for Number 1 and unless they themselves are ugly ss fck and they know they wouldn't stand a hope in hell with No.1, or they have a fetish for huge curvy women.
Men are visual....looks MATTER to them and even more so than with women. All men want a 'hot' chick on their arm, which is why all the grandads chase the young hot chicks on these sites. And if they can't get that, well that's why the 'ugly' chicks have a partner too.

Just what are you hoping to prove with this thread? That men don't go for looks like women do?? lol.....
That all 'good looking' people are assholes??
That all ugly fat people are nice?

Once again, EVERYONE goes for what appeals...

Physical and sexual attraction are as IMPORTANT as the emotional, spiritual and intellectual, so it's a complete waste of time and to try and discount it.

If I'm not attracted both physically and sexually, it's going no place.
If I'm not attracted to personality or traits, which come into play and AFTER the physical/sexual, it's going no place and even though he may be good looking.
If he's not on my intellectual level, it's going no place, even though he may be good looking.

We need all FIVE connections and to form long lasting relationships.

OP, if you can go out and screw the ugly fat chick and without having the need for a physical/sexual attraction....feel free.

Don't tell the rest of us what we should do, which is follow natural instinct.

I reckon you are pissed and cuz you aren't having much success in snaring the girls you want....the good looking ones. That women should forsake what is physically and sexually appealing and because men like you would then stand a better chance of snaring and getting Miss Stunner....

Guys who appeal to our eye, can be nice, friendly, loving decent guys too you know....believe it or not.

And these threads that you have posted....won't change how people think.

[Regnent]

Men are visual....looks MATTER to them and even more so than with women.

I disagree. I think women are just as visual, they're just more picky.
Many men are 'fine' with anything considered attractive in their eyes. A few things could be off, but as long as it fits the mould mostly, we'll show an interest.
Women on the other hand, seem to want specifics more.

[xxazurexx]

I disagree. I think women are just as visual, they're just more picky.
Many men are 'fine' with anything considered attractive in their eyes. A few things could be off, but as long as it fits the mould mostly, we'll show an interest.
Women on the other hand, seem to want specifics more.

We don't get as excited over an image of a dick, as men will over pics of tits....hence why mens pastime is 'porn'. Not that women dont view it....men view it MORE.

Females wouldn't want to bang a man and based solely on the fact he has a big cock....some men would love to bang a woman and because of a nice arse, huge tits....


Men are more focused with the visual....FACT!

[UnknownSld03]

We don't get as excited over an image of a dick, as men will over pics of tits....hence why mens pastime is 'porn'. Not that women dont view it....men view it MORE.

Females wouldn't want to bang a man and based solely on the fact he has a big cock....some men would love to bang a woman and because of a nice arse, huge tits....


Men are more focused with the visual....FACT!

Yea, not true. I know plenty of females, younger and older, who get incredibly turned on from an image of a dick. Also, I know plenty of females, older and younger as well, who want a man with a big cock (i.e. 7 to 10 inches). Many of those females prefer African American men because of that simple reason. Not all men want to have sex with a woman just because she has big breasts or ass. For me at least, there has to be more than just physical attraction. You also say that men are more focused on the visual and that is a fact. Well, sounds to me like the ladies on this forum who have replied to my post, just DO NOT like being called out on the TRUTH.

[Regnent]

Men are more focused with the visual....FACT!

False.
We're more focused on ****ing you. Granted.
We don't require, or even need an emotional, or personal connection to -want- to screw you.
So yah, the visuals are -enough- to get us interested in you physically.

It may not be enough for a woman, but that doesn't mean that looks are any more or less important.

[doppelgaenger]

We don't get as excited over an image of a dick, as men will over pics of tits....hence why mens pastime is 'porn'.

Why are you comparing dicks to tits? You should compare dick to pussy, and tits to chest.

For the record, I don't get very excited over images of vaginas. In fact, I find vaginas kind of repulsive in general. A nice looking vagina is quite rare, as opposed to the beloved roast beef curtains and meat wallets. I actually think the penis is more aesthetically pleasing... a nice pair of tits is fun to look at but I like to see the whole figure. A square image of just tits is not going to get me horny.

And saying porn is the "pastime of men" is very sexist and untrue. A lot of girls seem to enjoy porn these days.